 
| ADVANTAGES | CHALLENGE | 
| • Both column and foundation can be precast and connected. | • The connection is cumbersome to construct, and require tight bar length tolerance. | 
| Structural performance | 5/5 (0 have significant issue, 5 same/better when compared to conventional CIP method) | 
| Constructability | 2/5 (0 difficult, 5 easily) | 
| Speed of construction | 3/5 (0 very slow, 5 very fast) | 
| Cost | 3/5 (0 very expensive, 5 cost effective when compared to conventional CIP method) | 
| Organization | Contact name | Phone number | |
| University of Nevada, Reno | Zachary B. Haber M. Saiid Saiidi David H. Sanders | saiidi@unr.edu |