ADVANTAGES | CHALLENGE |
• Both column and foundation can be precast and connected. | • The connection is cumbersome to construct, and require tight bar length tolerance. |
Structural performance | 5/5 (0 have significant issue, 5 same/better when compared to conventional CIP method) |
Constructability | 2/5 (0 difficult, 5 easily) |
Speed of construction | 3/5 (0 very slow, 5 very fast) |
Cost | 3/5 (0 very expensive, 5 cost effective when compared to conventional CIP method) |
Organization | Contact name | Phone number | |
University of Nevada, Reno | Zachary B. Haber M. Saiid Saiidi David H. Sanders | saiidi@unr.edu |